However, on the Mac, LTFS is, at best, a very mixed blessing. You could open it, see what files were on it and move files onto it. The benefits of LTFS, especially on Windows, are obvious – it allowed an LTO drive to act like a very, very slow hard disk. What this did was allow an LTO drive to act like a hard disk by appearing directly on your desktop, so you could drag files on or off the tape, similar to how we drag and drop files onto a hard disk.
#MOVIECAPTIONER REVIEW DRIVER#
MSRP: $499 (US) – 30-day free trial available restoring files from tape can be done from the free trialīack in 2010, the LTO Consortium (Quantium, HP, Tandberg and IBM), which controls the LTO format, released a software driver solution for current LTO-5 and newer drives called LTFS (Linear Tape Filing System). If you are looking for fast, reliable and easy to use archiving software, BRU PE needs to be on your short list. Even better, the free trial always allows restoring files from tape, even if the trial period has expired. It bypasses the LTFS file system for performance and reliability reasons, runs on Windows, Linux, Mac, and most other Unix operating systems and supports all current and former LTO and other format tape drives.s.īRU PE is a solid performer with a 30-year track record.
It provides a simple drag-and-drop interface for non-engineer creative types, with an advanced menu for techies that want more control over how tapes and files are handled. It can handle hundreds of thousands of files, run essentially unattended – except for changing tapes – and find any file, or group of files, you need to restore from tape back to your hard disk. While this software is most often bundled with LTO hardware, if you already own an LTO drive, you can purchase the software separately.īRU PE provides a straight-forward method of transferring any digital file from hard disk to LTO tape. NOTE: The difference between backups and archives are that backups are short-term and archives are long-term.īRU PE (Producer’s Edition) from TOLIS Group is designed to simplify archiving so that you can safely protect your assets without becoming a rocket scientist. And, third, because it takes too long, costs too much and is too difficult to learn. For information on why sign language interpretation, C-Print captioning, and alternate assignments generally do not meet this standard for videos, please contact the Student Accessibility Services Director, at 67.Archiving is one of those tasks that everyone puts off until we run out of excuses. Alternate Forms of Access Alternatives to closed captioning of audiovisuals are required by law to be “equivalent” and “effective”. YouTube captions are often inaccurate, and may be offensive.
#MOVIECAPTIONER REVIEW MOVIE#
Caption your own videos with Movie Captioner.This is an alternative that departments may choose for captioning needs that must be expedited. Each department will incur this expense from their budget. Contact Student Accessibility Services to arrange to have your videos captioned through (AMAC – Accessibility Solutions and Research Center) for a fee.There is no cost to your department for this service. Contact the Distance Education and Technology Integration (DETI) Director, Irene Kokkala as far in advance as possible to arrange for your videos to be captioned.If a captioned version is not available, please go to step A, B, or C. If your audiovisuals are not captioned, please contact the Collection Management Librarian, Joy Bolt at (706) 864-1514 as far in advance as possible for assistance in locating or purchasing a captioned version of the video.If you need help determining whether your media has captions/subtitles contact the I.T. Check to see if your audiovisuals have captions or subtitles available.Course content, to include audiovisuals such as DVDs and YouTube clips, must be accessible to all students, including students with disabilities. The Board of Regents has determined that all institutions in the USG fall within the scope of Section 508. Additionally, people with disabilities must be able to access the information with substantially equivalent ease of use as people without disabilities. To be accessible, technology must permit students with disabilities to receive the educational benefits provided through technology in an equally effective and equally integrated manner. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998
0 kommentar(er)
